🧭 Ethical Case Study

UBC = Understanding + Background + Challenges )

Workplace Ethics, Professional Integrity, and Institutional Responsibility in a Government Training Institute

1. Understanding the Case

This case highlights issues of workplace ethics, professional conduct, misuse of informal authority, and institutional discipline within a government-run Advanced Training Centre (ATC).

A newly appointed Trainer (Rohit) faces continuous unprofessional behavior, intimidation, and obstruction from a colleague (Mr. Rajesh), a non-teaching staff member (role is to maintain the machinery and workshop ) . The situation escalates from lack of cooperation to public humiliation, interference in teaching, coercion, and attempts to manipulate students and records.

Notably, the conduct also reflects the creation of an artificial hierarchy, where an individual without formal authority attempts to assert dominance and control over academic and administrative processes.

The case raises critical ethical questions regarding:

Professional integrity vs. workplace politics
Duty towards students vs. administrative disruptions
Tolerance vs. timely escalation of misconduct
Individual dignity vs. institutional discipline

2. Background of the Case

Rohit, a sincere and committed Trainer, joined the ATC with the objective of delivering quality technical education, particularly in Robotics and related trades.

However, from the initial days, he faced systematic non-cooperation from Mr. Rajesh, who:

Failed to provide knowledge transfer (KT), study materials, or subject clarity what docs are there , affecting onboarding.
Did not conduct assigned classes regularly, despite institutional instructions.
Frequently interfered in classrooms, questioning teaching methods in front of students.
Used rude, humiliating, and aggressive language, undermining dignity.
Created confusion in institutional functioning, such as delayed opening of ATC and mismanagement of student movement.
Delayed provision of raw materials, disrupting practical sessions like CNC , Robotics training.
Attempted to influence students to complain against Rohit and allegedly threatened job security.
Encouraged falsification of records (e.g., WhatsApp reporting under Master Trainer supervision even when absent).
Restricted basic facilities (e.g., locking common washroom), causing inconvenience and friction.
Displayed poor work discipline, including frequent phone usage and early departure from duty hours.

Additionally:

The Principal and RDD had already cautioned Mr. Rajesh and emphasized proper conduct.
Rohit initially chose restraint and informal resolution, prioritizing institutional harmony and the colleague’s professional growth.
However, continued misconduct, coupled with attempts to assert informal control and artificial authority, created a hostile, demoralizing, and politically charged environment.

3. Ethical Issues Involved

Abuse of Informal Power

Acting beyond authority and creating an artificial hierarchy within the institution.

Violation of Professional Ethics

Public humiliation, disrespect, and lack of workplace decorum.

Compromise of Academic Integrity

Disruption of classes, discouraging practical learning, and falsification of records.

Coercion and Intimidation

Threats of retaliation and influencing students and staff for personal motives.

Lack of Accountability

Avoidance of responsibilities like teaching, timely attendance, and material support.

Impact on Vulnerable Students

Insensitive handling of economically weaker students, leading to disengagement.

Toxic Work Environment

Promotion of fear, mistrust, and unhealthy power dynamics driven by ego and dominance.

4. Stakeholders Involved

Rohit (Dept. Trainer) – dignity, professional growth, mental well-being
Students (especially from poor backgrounds) – quality education, motivation, continuity
Mr. Rajesh (colleague) – accountability, behavioral correction
Principal & RDD – institutional discipline, governance and administration responsibility
Other Faculty Members – workplace harmony and psychological safety
Institution (ATC/ITI) – reputation, efficiency, public trust

5. Core Ethical Values in Conflict

Integrity vs. Manipulation
Respect vs. Humiliation
Duty vs. Negligence
Transparency vs. Falsification
Cooperation vs. Ego-driven behavior
Equality vs. Artificial Hierarchy
Integrity vs. Defamation
Truth vs. Misrepresentation
Accountability vs. Abuse of Authority
Professionalism vs. Misconduct
Respect vs. Humiliation
Transparency vs. Falsification
Justice (Natural Justice) vs. Coercion
Institutional Integrity vs. Personal Ego
Ethical Leadership vs. Authoritarian Behavior
Equality vs. Artificial Hierarchy
Trust vs. Intimidation
Moral Courage vs. Fear-induced Silence

6. Challenges Faced by Rohit

Maintaining professional composure under provocation
Balancing patience vs. timely escalation
Protecting students’ interests despite disruptions
Handling false allegations and reputational risks
Navigating an environment influenced by informal power structures
Upholding ethical conduct without escalating conflict unnecessarily

7. Options Available

Option 1: Continue Ignoring the Behavior

✔ Maintains temporary peace
❌ Encourages further misconduct (this was continuing already )
❌ Strengthens artificial hierarchy

Option 2: Informal Discussion with Colleague

✔ Ethical, cooperative approach
❌ Already attempted, ineffective ( THEY SAID TIME COMES -PATIENCE)

Option 3: Report to Principal (Internal Escalation)

✔ Maintains institutional hierarchy
✔ Counters misuse of informal authority
❌ May escalate interpersonal conflict (already started )

Option 4: Formal Written Complaint

✔ Ensures accountability and documentation
✔ Protects against defamation and coercion
✔ Helps dismantle artificial hierarchy
❌ May impact colleague’s career ( thats why i didnt approached , have given no.of chances)

8. Ethical Course of Action (Best Approach)

The most appropriate course of action is a balanced and principled escalation:

Submit a formal, fact-based complaint
Focus on conduct, not personal attacks
Provide specific incidents and evidence
Maintain professionalism and restraint.
Continue sincere teaching efforts.
Prioritize student welfare.
Support institutional discipline and formal authority structures
Ensure that informal dominance and artificial hierarchy are not normalized

9. Justification (Ethical Reasoning)

Deontological Ethics (Duty-based):

Rohit has a duty to uphold truth, discipline, and institutional norms.

Utilitarianism (Greatest Good):

Addressing misconduct benefits the larger student community and staff.

Virtue Ethics:

Demonstrates patience, courage, integrity, and moral responsibility.

10. Conclusion

This case reflects how unchecked unprofessional behavior, combined with the creation of an artificial hierarchy, can erode institutional values, damage morale, and negatively impact student outcomes.

While patience and empathy are important, ethical responsibility demands timely and appropriate action against persistent misconduct. A balanced approach—combining professional restraint, factual documentation, and institutional accountability—is essential to restore discipline, uphold dignity, and ensure that the academic environment remains fair, respectful, and student-centric.

===========================================

Series of Incidents

“It has been brought to my notice by colleagues that during a staff assembly, Mr. Rajesh made a remark to the effect of ‘mimmalni ekkada choosukovalo naak telsu akkade chooskuntam,’ ,,,!!!

Maa MASTER trainer lu chepindhe vinali ,,, implying that he would deal with individuals at an opportune time. Such a statement, as reported, carries an implicit tone of intimidation and control.

This reflects an attitude marked by arrogance,Ego, dominance, and disregard for professional decorum, and appears intended to create fear and assert undue influence over colleagues. The fact that several staff members felt uncomfortable yet chose to remain silent further indicates the coercive and unhealthy nature of such conduct within the workplace.”

Reference: Oral Saying through ATC Faculty of Warangal Region.

==================

DATE ; _____________

TIME ; ____________

It is pertinent to clarify that similar conduct by Mr. Rajesh has reportedly been experienced by multiple faculty members; however, many chose to exercise restraint and tolerance in the interest of maintaining institutional harmony.

In my case, I initially adopted a patient and composed approach, repeatedly advising him in a calm and professional manner to adhere to appropriate conduct. Despite this, his behavior appeared to be selectively escalated towards me, particularly in the context of my active engagement, consistent student attendance, and sustained efforts towards student welfare through innovative teaching practices.

Over time, as the instances of unprofessional conduct, interference, and intimidation increased, my threshold of tolerance was exceeded, leading me to formally object. The pattern of actions suggests an attempt to assert undue visibility and control, which has unfortunately been pursued at the cost of professional ethics, collegial respect, and the overall academic environment.”

==================================================================

DATE ; 11-Sept-2025

TIME ; ____________

“Despite repeated requests, Mr. Rajesh failed to provide essential , trade study materials, subject details, and did not conduct any Knowledge Transfer (KT) sessions for newly joined Trainers,, including myself and my colleague Ms. Chakkani gaaru, thereby hindering our ability to effectively discharge our duties at the ATC.”..

=============================================================

DATE ; 27-09-2025

TIME ; 11-20 a.m

While I was attending my training sessions at ATC KHAMMAM On 27 /sept/ 2025 , Mr. Rajesh, in a loud, sarcastic, and demoralizing tone, publicly addressed me with remarks such as ‘Rohit, you go and learn ...heehehe........,’ which was clearly intended to belittle and undermine my efforts. Such conduct was disrespectful, unwarranted, and conveyed a lack of professional courtesy.

His behavior not only caused personal humiliation but also created an atmosphere of intimidation and diminished my dignity in front of others, reflecting unprofessional and discourteous conduct.”

=============================================================

DATE ; ____________________

TIME ; ____________________

Mr. Rajesh’s conduct of entering my classroom various Times and questioning me in a rude and public manner regarding documents and syllabus materials caused undue humiliation and reflects unprofessional behavior unbecoming of a colleague.”

acted beyond his authority by questioning me rudely in front of students, creating an unprofessional and humiliating environment.”

Mr. Rajesh appeared in improper attire, with his shirt unbuttoned at the top, and his rude conduct while questioning me further reflected unprofessional and inappropriate behavior.”

===================================================================

DATE ; ____________________

TIME ; ____________________

M cheptunnnv Sirrr?? koncham manchigaa cheppu (hehehe)

Mr. Rajesh repeatedly and without authorization entered my classroom, disrupted ongoing sessions, and questioned students on Robotics trade topics; despite students answering correctly, he dismissed their responses and publicly criticized my teaching in a rude and derogatory manner. This conduct amounts to unwarranted interference, undermines professional dignity, and has created a hostile and demoralizing classroom environment

==================================================================

DATE ; ____________________

TIME ; ____________________

“During the initial months of November and December, a significant number of students from economically disadvantaged backgrounds were attending classes, many of whom did not possess proper uniform sets. While the institution had advised corrective measures such as obtaining letters and undertakings, I adopted a constructive and student-sensitive approach by counseling students and communicating with their parents to ensure gradual compliance without affecting their learning , and a stand and listen approach.

However, Mr. Rajesh repeatedly intervened during ongoing classes without authorization, disrupted the academic process, and compelled students to leave the classroom and stand in the corridor for extended periods (2–3 hours) on grounds of uniform non-compliance. S

Such actions were excessively harsh, pedagogically unsound, and detrimental to the students’ morale and dignity.

This not only resulted in loss of valuable instructional time but also created fear, embarrassment, and disengagement among students, particularly those from vulnerable backgrounds, ultimately contributing to irregular attendance and, in several cases, students discontinuing their participation in classes.”

evidence ; l sai kumar sir ( cnc) faculty

2 Sruti (VAD)

=============================================================

During December

DATE ; ____________________

TIME ; ____________________

Mr. Rajesh’s failure to ensure timely opening of the ATC and his subsequent rude and dismissive response to a genuine concern raised by me led to confusion among students, unnecessary movement between campuses, and avoidable loss of academic time, reflecting poor coordination and unprofessional conduct.”

=============================================================

DATE ; ____________________

TIME ; ____________________

<<<""NINNU EKKADA CHUSKOVALO AKDA CHUSKUNTA :"">>> Frequent Dialogue

Mr. Rajesh’s repeated remarks suggesting potential future retaliation for raising genuine concerns reflect a coercive and intimidating attitude, undermining professional integrity and discouraging open and truthful communication in the workplace.”

Mr. Rajesh’s unprofessional conduct is not limited to my case alone; he has also spoken in a disrespectful manner to senior faculty members, including those with decades of experience. This pattern of behavior reflects a lack of basic professional courtesy and respect within the institution. The concerned faculty members may be consulted for further clarification, if required.”

=============================================================

DATE ; ____________________

TIME ; ____________________

“On several occasions, even Honourable Principal gaaru has objected to Mr. Rajesh’s behavior and advised him to maintain professionalism and courtesy, providing him with multiple opportunities to सुधार his conduct. However, there has been no visible improvement, and the same pattern of behavior continues.

This ongoing misconduct is adversely affecting the healthy and collaborative environment of the ATC, fostering unhealthy power dynamics and workplace friction, which is detrimental to the institution’s functioning—especially considering that many students depend on us for guidance and quality education.

=============================================================

DATE ; ____________________

TIME ; ____________________

The Honourable Principal G.Sakru Gaaru has, on multiple occasions, advised us to submit a formal written complaint against Mr. Rajesh in view of his continued unprofessional conduct. However, we refrained from doing so, considering that he is relatively new to the service and with the intention of allowing him an opportunity to improve and adopt professional standards.

We consistently attempted to address the issues at an informal level, prioritizing institutional harmony over escalation. Despite these efforts and repeated guidance from the Principal, there has been no meaningful improvement in his behavior.

His conduct has continued in the same manner, disregarding both advice and opportunities for correction. This has compelled us to formally place these concerns on record.”

==========================================================

DATE ; ____________________

TIME ; ____________________

“Despite clear instructions mandating regular class engagement by all Master Trainers,

Reference : RDD SIR INSTRUCTIONS 3 PAGE DATED ( 18-11-2025) on improving Training Quality.

Mr. Rajesh has shown minimal involvement, having conducted only ONE Robotics sessions (in March that too welding ,,,.

and none prior to that, indicating a consistent neglect of his academic responsibilities.”

and subjected to his TIMESHEET Verification.

Even the few sessions conducted by Mr. Rajesh—arranged upon the Principal’s insistence—were limited to welding ,, and were executed in a non-participatory manner, with no opportunity given to students for hands-on practice. Such conduct defeats the purpose of skill-based education and demonstrates a lack of commitment to effective teaching and student learning outcomes.”

============================================================

DATE ; ____________________

TIME ; ____________________

“It has also been reported by students, including those from other trades, that Mr. Rajesh has been informally approaching and questioning them with the apparent intention of identifying individuals who may be willing to make complaints against me.

Further, he has allegedly made statements to students suggesting that he would take steps to have me removed from my position. Such conduct, if true, is highly inappropriate, amounts to misuse of influence, and creates an atmosphere of fear and intimidation among students, which is detrimental to both academic integrity and a healthy institutional environment.”

============================================================

DATE ; ____________________

TIME ; ____________________

“Mr. Rajesh, despite being available in the staff room, has repeatedly chosen to contact through WHATSAPP CAL L during active classroom hours (around 11:00–11:30 a.m.) in an abrupt and demanding manner, insisting that I immediately produce documents for verification (Despite its not his Duty to check my Academic Documents ) . Such interruptions during instructional time are inappropriate and disruptive to the teaching–learning process. Any administrative requirement should be communicated through proper channels and outside class hours. I have formally objected to this conduct and request that such practices be discontinued. This behavior is unacceptable and adversely affects academic discipline and classroom effectiveness.”

Ref - l sai sir -cnc

He stays within ATC , WHY TO CALL ON WHATSAPP UNNECESSARILY , WHEN EVERY ONE IS UNDER SAME ROOF

Proof;

======================================================================

DATE ; ____________________

TIME ; ____________________

“Mr. Rajesh is frequently engaged in phone conversations during official working hours, which can be verified through CCTV footage if necessary. This pattern of behavior indicates a lack of work discipline and raises serious concerns about his commitment to institutional responsibilities.”

ALWAYS ON PHONE IS REALLY BAD , ESPECIALLY AT WORK PLACE

====================================================================

DATE ; ____________________

TIME ; ____________________

“It was observed that Mr. Rajesh had locked the only washroom facility used by approximately eight staff members, retaining control of the keys. This caused repeated inconvenience, as access required locating the keys or requesting them, often leading to disruption of ongoing classes. Such an arrangement created an unnecessary and uncomfortable working environment, adversely affecting academic functioning and staff convenience. Although this practice has since been discontinued, it had earlier contributed to workplace friction and dissatisfaction among staff.”

The repeated delay by Mr. Rajesh in supplying essential raw materials for practical sessions, particularly during engagements, has led to significant disruption of academic activities and loss of valuable training time, reflecting poor coordination and lack of responsibility towards instructional requirements.”

This WASHROOM LOCKING SYSTEM was seen NO OTHER PLACES.

================================================================

DATE ; ____________________

TIME ; ____________________

As per the Principal’s instructions from January, timesheets were to be duly signed by the Master Trainer as part of proper documentation, which we have consistently maintained without objection. However, towards the end of the month (around the 25th onwards), Mr. Rajesh’s behavior became increasingly uncooperative and inconsistent, particularly regarding the signing of timesheets. Instead of following a clear verification process, responsibility for signatures was arbitrarily shifted between individuals without any defined timeline or communication, causing unnecessary confusion and delays. This lack of clarity and coordination, especially at the end of the working month, created avoidable uncertainty despite our continuous discharge of duties. Such conduct appears to reflect an attitude of non-cooperation and disregard for administrative efficiency, adversely affecting staff morale and institutional functioning.”

Reference /proof :

===================================================================

DATE ; ____________________

TIME ; ____________________

“It has been observed that Mr. Rajesh frequently leaves the institution around 3:30 p.m., despite official working hours extending until 5:00 p.m., citing personal travel reasons. This regular early departure reflects non-adherence to prescribed duty timings and results in reduced availability for institutional responsibilities. In contrast, other staff members, including the Principal who commutes from a longer distance, consistently adhere to official timings, demonstrating commitment and discipline. Such inconsistency in attendance and accountability raises concerns regarding work ethics and sets an undesirable precedent within the institution.”

===============================================================

DATE ; ____________________

TIME ; ____________________

Given the need for interdisciplinary awareness due to frequent visits from students of various government schools, I visited the 3D Printing laboratory to understand the process while my colleague Mr. Paitari Shivakumar was explaining an ongoing activity creating ram idol ( For this time i waited for long time as this experiment cant be conducted again (COST HIGH RESINS) ,, with resins chemicals etcc.. . During this time, Mr. Rajesh entered the laboratory and, in an arrogant and aggressive manner, questioned my presence without justification.

He further directed Mr. Paitari Shivakumar—under whose supervision the laboratory was functioning—to leave the lab in a rude and disrespectful manner, which was highly unprofessional. Such conduct created an uncomfortable and humiliating environment for both staff and students and disrupted a collaborative academic setting.

Despite this, I maintained restraint and did not escalate the situation at that time.”

Proof : Check CCTV on_______________

==========================================

DATE ; 02- MARCH -2026

TIME ; 04 :29 P.M

“Mr. Rajesh instructed that only Master Trainers should post updates in the RDD WhatsApp group and further mandated that every post must include a statement indicating that the activity was conducted under the observation of the Master Trainer. This direction was enforced even in instances where such supervision had not actually taken place, Reflects an attempt to assert undue control and claim unwarranted attribution, Identitiy. effectively compelling the recording of inaccurate information. Such insistence, communicated in an intimidating and forceful manner, raises serious concerns regarding integrity, transparency, and adherence to truthful reporting within the institution.”.

Proof:

============================================================

DATE ; 23- 12-2026

TIME ; _________

THE ALLEGATION OF MOVIE SHOW - INCIDENT

“Mr. Rajesh has also made baseless and unfounded allegations against me, including claims that I was regularly showing movies to students, which is entirely incorrect. Such statements not only misrepresent my sincere efforts towards teaching and student engagement but also damage my professional reputation. Making unverified Intentional allegations against a committed staff member creates unnecessary distress and reflects a lack of responsibility and fairness. This behavior contributes to a negative and politically charged work environment, fostering distrust, discouragement, and emotional strain, which is detrimental to the healthy functioning of an academic institution.

It is also pertinent to note that both the Principal and the RDD have opposed such conduct . and Honourable RDD Gaaru have convened a meeting at 5:00 p.m. to emphasize appropriate behavior in ATCs and to clearly outline the roles and responsibilities of Master Trainers and DET Trainers.” in the Presence of Jhumla Naik Gaaru..

=================================================

DATE ; ____________________

TIME ; ____________________

THE DIGNITY OF STUDENT INCIDENT - Deliberately Making them Sit Down.

“During my absence for official training, my students were reportedly made to sit on a dusty floor by the M.T, which is highly inappropriate and reflects disregard for student dignity and basic standards of a learning environment. Such actions point towards a negative and unprofessional attitude, adversely affecting the academic and institutional climate.”

This was done to CNC Trades Students also.

=======================================================

DATE ; ______________

TIME ; ____________________

THE ELECTRICAL CYCLE INCIDENT

“It is also pertinent to highlight an incident involving my colleague, Ms. Chakkani gaaru (MPCA Trade), who was engaged in an experimental session related to the assembly of an electric bicycle as per prior instructions. During this process, Mr. Rajesh reportedly entered the workshop area and, in the presence of students, addressed her in a humiliating and derogatory manner, questioning her competence with remarks implying that she had learned nothing during training and lacked even basic (‘jnan’) knowledge. Such statements, made publicly, caused significant distress and embarrassment, affecting her morale and professional dignity to the extent that she refrained from interaction for several days thereafter. This incident clearly demonstrates that the pattern of inappropriate and hurtful verbal conduct is not isolated to me but extends to other staff members as well, thereby contributing to a demoralizing and unhealthy work environment.”

==================================================================

DATE ; ____________________

TIME ; ____________________

DOMINANCE , - NENE RAJU INCIDENT

“I have consistently communicated that any requests, issues, or concerns should be directly addressed to the Principal or the T.O ,, Director, following the proper institutional protocol.

However, Mr. Rajesh, despite being a Master Trainer, has repeatedly intervened in matters outside his jurisdiction, creating artificial hierarchies and inserting himself unnecessarily into issues that rightfully fall under the Principal’s authority.

Such behavior disrupts the chain of command, fosters confusion, and undermines institutional control, while asserting undue authority and ego within a small staff environment.”

He told " MEERU EDHI UNNA ONLY NAAKE CHEPPALI , PRINCIPAL KI CHEPPINA VINARU "

===============================================================

DATE ; ____________________

TIME ; ____________________

===================================================================

DATE ; ____________________

TIME ; ____________________

============================================================

DATE ; ____________________

TIME ; ____________________

FORCED WRITTEN COMPLAINT

“Mr. Rajesh has further escalated the situation by submitting a formal written complaint against me containing baseless and factually incorrect allegations, including claims that , I do not conduct classes and engage in non-productive activities. These allegations are entirely unfounded and stand in stark contrast to my consistent efforts in delivering quality instruction, developing innovative teaching methods, creating academic blogs, providing digital learning resources to multiple Industrial Training Institutes, and facilitating platforms such as YouTube to enhance student engagement and expression.

It has also been brought to my notice that Mr. Rajesh misrepresented ,

Done Character assassination – deliberately damaging someone’s reputation ) to the Principal that I had spoken negatively about other staff members, alleging that they were not performing their duties at all , which is categorically untrue. On the contrary, it appears that he exerted undue pressure on certain staff members by suggesting that non-compliance with his directions would result in warning memos from the Principal. This created a climate of fear and coercion, leading to signatures being obtained on the complaint without informed consent, with some individuals reportedly not having read the contents of the document.

Furthermore, the said complaint was escalated to higher administrative levels of Company , including TTL HR Baswaraju and the concerned department, without proper verification of facts. This sequence of actions reflects a serious misuse of process, involving coercion, misrepresentation, and potential fabrication of consensus, thereby undermining institutional integrity, professional trust, and due process. Such conduct is deeply concerning and warrants thorough and impartial examination.””

- ITS ESCALATED SECRETLY by Him ,

“Subsequently, several colleagues expressed regret regarding their association with the complaint, stating that their signatures had been obtained under pressure and on the basis of misleading or exaggerated representations. They conveyed that they were not fully aware of the contents or implications at the time of signing and later felt that the process was unfair. This incident indicates the presence of undue influence and miscommunication, further reinforcing concerns about the manner in which the complaint was initiated and supported.

“It has also been reported that Mr. Rajesh conveyed to other staff members that I had been handling critical system-related and intellectually demanding work ( SYSTEM RELATED COMPUTER WORK ) from October to January, but was no longer contributing or supporting the Principal, thereby causing a negative perception about the ATC Faculty team’s functioning.

This representation is misleading and factually incorrect. From January onwards, with the commencement of Robotics activities and completion of the workshop setup, my responsibilities were primarily directed towards conducting regular classes, managing practical sessions, and attending official training programs. and making Students Thrive in their Work, Building Confidence.

My Training Schedule

The Principal gaaru , understood my situation

I had also appropriately informed the Principal gaaru regarding the increased workload arising from these academic and training commitments.

However, it appears that Mr. Rajesh mischaracterized this situation, attributing increased workload to my alleged non-cooperation to him and further conveyed to staff that they might (WILL ) face professional Problems / difficulties due to me. Such statements amount to misrepresentation, create unnecessary apprehension among staff, and contribute to a climate of misunderstanding and mistrust within the institution.”

THE FEBRUARY PMKVY INCIDENT

In February, while I was engaged in training sessions at ATC Warangal, Our Principal Gaaru instructed me to complete 30 admissions for the PMKVY EDT trade course. I informed the Principal that, due to my ongoing academic responsibilities (Tot Training on Ajna lens ) , it would be difficult to manage both tasks simultaneously.

Despite making extensive efforts, including contacting 40 prospective students from the official office line and documenting all remarks and follow-ups, the admissions could not be completed that day.

i asked help of the principal to assist others so that task can be finished on time.

The Principal understtod / acknowledged my situation and assigned the task to Mr. Rajesh.

Nevertheless, Mr. Rajesh subsequently misrepresented the situation to other staff members, implying that I had deliberately avoided my responsibilities. This false narrative created unnecessary confusion, professional unrest, and a disruptive work environment, reflecting an attempt to manipulate perceptions and target me unfairly within the ATC.”

==============================================================

DATE ; 31/March/2026

TIME ; 4:50 p.m

THE MARCH TIMESHEET INCIDENT - Blasted INJUSTICE

“On 31st March, all required documents and records had been properly updated and verified earlier itself , and the routine process of obtaining Master Trainers’ signatures was in place. Despite this, a procedural stalemate occurred: one Master Trainer (Ram Prasad) directed staff to obtain signatures from Mr. Rajesh, while Mr. Rajesh insisted that they go to Ram Prasad. This circular referral created unnecessary confusion, delayed official documentation, and appeared to be a deliberate assertion of dominance and authority rather than a procedural necessity.

The situation escalated into a tense confrontation, described as a ‘cold war’ of words, with

Mr. L. Saikumar of the CNC trade openly criticizing the misconduct and

unprofessional behavior of Mr. Rajesh. Staff were visibly anxious and unsettled due to the ongoing verbal confrontation.

The Principal intervened to defer resolution, stating the matter would be addressed the following day. This incident reflects a serious lapse in professional conduct, workplace decorum, and institutional discipline, highlighting the adverse impact of ego-driven behavior on operational efficiency and staff morale.”

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Whats My Background ....???

Have been Good Student through out my academics

https://youtu.be/A5CYQSsLpjs?si=k-Sciv8PxqtGW3nx

Have been A Blogger , Writer , poet ....and many more accomplishments

Have been preparing for upsc civil services Exams since, 2021 ( B .tech ) 3rd year

to Serve the people of my country.

Trained on Spirituality, Monkhood, life skills and Ethics , philosophy of lord krishna , Bhagavadgita for 3 years at ISKCON during COVID TIMES.

conducted many seminors , workshops on wellbeing and service .

have been a good student at L. IAS ACADEMY ,Bangalore ( been the fav. student ) and a doubt solver for many aspirants.

Have been a Sociology , political science , law Student .

FROM BHAGAVAD GITA , IVE LEARNT TO BE ,

TOP QUALITIES,

I PICKED FROM THE WISDOM OF GEETA.

Fearlessness
Purity of heart
Steadfastness in knowledge and discipline
Charity (with discernment)
Control of senses
Commitment to higher purpose (sacrifice)
Continuous learning
Austerity / self-discipline
Straightforwardness
Non-violence (with strength, not weakness)
Truthfulness
Absence of uncontrolled anger
Detachment (not indifference)
Inner peace
Avoidance of unnecessary criticism
Compassion with boundaries
Absence of greed
Gentleness with firmness
Modesty with confidence
Steadiness under pressure
Vigour / energetic action
Forgiveness (without losing wisdom)
Fortitude / resilience
Cleanliness (inner & outer)
Absence of hatred
Absence of arrogance

Self-respect
Clear boundaries
Zero tolerance for nonsense / injustice
Courage to speak truth to power
Accountability (owning actions fully)
Integrity in private and public (MANASAA VACHA KARMENA))
Clarity of thought
Ability to guide and uplift others
Patience while dealing with people
Emotional maturity
Practical wisdom
Consistency in actions
Decisiveness
Respect for others without losing self-worth

Vision (seeing the bigger picture)
Ability to inspire others
Leading by example
Responsibility towards people
Strong decision-making under uncertainty
Crisis management ability
Strategic thinking
Delegation with trust
Effective communication
Listening deeply before acting
Fairness and impartiality
Adaptability to change
Conflict resolution skills
Team-building ability
Long-term thinking over short-term gains
Moral courage in difficult situations
Ability to take criticism constructively
Discipline in execution
Service mindset (people-first attitude)
Leaving a positive legacy

AFTER YEARS OF STRUGGLES BAGGAGE OF FAILURES ,,

I entered GITI HNDA

rohit bejjala upsc notes Bejjup