British developments after 1858 till Independence
Indian Councils Act, 1861 – Key Features & Significance
1. Introduction & Background
- Enacted by the British Parliament to increase Indian participation in the legislative process.
- Came in response to the Revolt of 1857, aiming to make governance more inclusive.
2. Key Features of the Act
-
Introduction of Non-Official Members
- For the first time, non-official Indians were included in legislative councils.
- Though their presence was symbolic, it marked the beginning of Indian representation.
-
Law-Making Became a Deliberative Process
- Laws could be made only after discussion and debate.
- Law-making was no longer exclusively under executive control.
-
Portfolio System Introduced (By Lord Canning)
- Laid the foundation for cabinet government in India.
- Each branch of administration had a specific official head and spokesperson responsible for governance.
-
Provincial Legislative Devolution
- Legislative powers were given to Bombay & Madras governments.
- Allowed future establishment of legislative councils in other provinces.
3. Limitations & Weaknesses
-
Lack of Real Powers
- Legislative councils had no control over the executive.
- Members could not discuss important matters or financial issues without prior government approval.
- No power to influence budget discussions.
-
Viceroy’s & Secretary of State’s Control
- Any bill required Viceroy’s approval before passing.
- The Secretary of State (in London) could veto any legislation.
-
Elitist Representation
- Indians included in councils were mostly from the elite sections (landlords, princes, etc.).
- No real representation of the common people or nationalists.
4. Significance
- First step towards legislative reforms & representation.
- Introduced decentralization by empowering provincial governments.
- Laid the foundation for future legislative councils (e.g., Indian Councils Act, 1892 & 1909).
- However, it did not provide real power to Indians, keeping governance under British control.
This Act was one of the first attempts to bring Indians into governance but remained a superficial reform with no real autonomy.
==============================================
Indian Councils Act, 1892 – Key Highlights
1. Background
- Indian National Congress (INC) was founded in 1885.
- INC demanded reforms in legislative councils, considering them the “root of all other reforms”.
- In response, the British introduced the Indian Councils Act, 1892 to expand legislative councils.
2. Key Features of the Act
-
Expansion of Legislative Councils
- Increased the number of non-official members in both central (Imperial) and provincial councils.
- The Indian Legislative Council (Governor-General’s Council) was enlarged.
-
Introduction of Representation
- Universities, district boards, municipalities, zamindars, trade bodies, and chambers of commerce were empowered to recommend members to provincial councils.
- This introduced the principle of representation in governance.
-
Limited Indirect Election Introduced
- The term ‘election’ was avoided, but an indirect electoral process was accepted for some non-official members.
-
Increased Role in Financial Discussions
- Members could now express views on financial statements.
- Budgets were to be presented and discussed in legislative councils.
-
Limited Power to Question the Executive
- Members were allowed to ask questions on public matters, but with restrictions.
- Required six days’ prior notice to raise any query.
3. Significance & Limitations
✅ Significance
- Introduction of indirect elections, paving the way for future democratic reforms (e.g., Morley-Minto Reforms, 1909).
- Allowed discussion of budget and public matters, increasing political awareness.
❌ Limitations
- No real legislative power – Members could express views but could not amend or reject financial proposals.
- Executive was not accountable – The British-controlled government could ignore council discussions.
- Election process was indirect & limited – No direct elections were introduced.
This Act was a small but significant step in India’s constitutional evolution, leading to further demands for greater representation and self-governance.
=======================================================
Indian Councils Act, 1909 (Morley-Minto Reforms) – Key Highlights
1. Background
- First attempt to introduce a representative and popular element in governance.
- Named after Lord Morley (Secretary of State for India) and Lord Minto (Viceroy of India).
2. Key Features of the Act
-
Expansion of Legislative Councils
- Increased the strength of the Imperial Legislative Council.
- Increased the number of members in Provincial Executive Councils.
-
Inclusion of Indians in Executive Council
- First Indian (Satyendra Prasad Sinha) appointed as a law member in the Governor-General’s (Viceroy’s) Executive Council.
-
Increased Powers of Legislative Councils
- Members were allowed to discuss and question policies.
- However, real power remained with the British government, and councils had only advisory functions.
-
Introduction of Separate Electorates for Muslims
- Muslims were given separate electorates, leading to communal divisions.
- Muslims were given representation in excess of their population strength.
- Lower income qualification for Muslim voters compared to Hindus.
-
System of Election
- Very indirect – Representation of people at large remained limited and unrealistic.
3. Significance & Limitations
✅ Significance
- First Indian included in the Executive Council, a step towards Indian representation in administration.
- Expanded legislative councils at both central and provincial levels.
- Allowed Indians to criticize government policies.
❌ Limitations
- Real power remained with the British – Councils had no legislative or financial control.
- Separate electorates deepened communal divisions, later leading to the two-nation theory.
- Very indirect election process, making representation limited and ineffective.
This Act was a turning point in colonial governance, but it strengthened communalism and failed to satisfy nationalist demands, leading to further demands for self-governance in the Montagu-Chelmsford Reforms (1919).
============================================================
Comments
Post a Comment